We all know this age old debate.But still we dont have the conclusion.Gandhi and Marx are the main symbols of this debate.Its endless debate.Personally i feel sometimes we have to adopt some measures which we call generally immoral or amoral. Personally i dont have any strong opinion about these two poles but i found everywhere in our life we generally avoid the purity of means.In my opinion Gandhi also uses this thing when he gradually organise India's freedom movement.Firstly he spoke about Non cooperation than Civil disobedience than Karo ya maro.People say that the factor of violence increases these three levels gradually.I think we should not be too idealistic.There is no absolute truth.Its microcosm-ism every where about every reality and we should work according to that reality.Evan Gandhi called his life as a 'Experiments with truth' He never claimed that he is the proponent the ultimate reality or truth.In our real life situations, sometimes people gives soft bribe to their department too.Evan sometimes one officials gives other officials for their departmental work.And one another very interesting thing about idealism/absolute truth theory that its very risky for humanity.How? As far as i think the most violence supporter ideologies and movement like Marxism,Naxalism,Terrorism,Revolution, Militarism .All these ism always justify themselves in the name of justice/truth.And they never ready to talk or debate about their perception about the related problems.They generally avoid value of human life.Lastly their ideology and means become problems of others/humanity.
कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें