OMG-movie

OMG-- nice movie,The long long ago debate of philosophy comes in a bolliwood style.the simple massage that god and dharm are different u can believe in god without beliving dharm/majhab.The old indian philosophy did not describe dharm(duty) as religion.THE small comments and acting of paresh rawal is Jan of movie. He is the hero of the movie.Akhshay is looking like guest appearance.some dialogue 

are very touchy....
1.logo se unka bagvan mat chino varana vo tumhe bhgvan bana denge.may be it is true about all religious leaders or so called avtars of god who started their movement as social reform which become ultimately their own religion.
2. most of us are god fearing people not godloving people.
Its very grateful for indian cinema that they are choosing subject like this.
After all gangs of vasepur, Barfi and somewhat impressive OMG are just indicator of golden rise of indian cinema .These are nothing less to be a part of global cinema

PANSINGH TOMAR--Must See

It's very nice movie.Irfan does very well. The typical ascent of chambal region made it more better.It;s real life story of a foji cum runner cum daku.Who feces different phase of life.He joined the army because he was unemployed and he joined the athletics because normal quantity of food provided by army for jawan is not able to feed his stomach so he joined athletics.Later on the movie depicts the cruel feudal values of Chambal--Might is Right.His land was encroached by his relatives. he did not want to fight with them . he had believe in system.He thought that he is a national or international champion so local administration will Liston him  but  police through him from the police station with his medals.Then his son was beaten by his relatives and they were searching for his blood. So he had no choice except becoming a Bagi/dacait.He never wanted to be BAGI but he had not have any choice. It is story of general phenomena how people becomes criminal.In the last few moments he asked his relatives that why they did those things with him but he did not get any answer.

Love Marriage-Arrange Marriage

There is no big difference -love marriage is a type of arrange marriage which is decided by themselves(boy+girl) with all the future calculation, earlier which is done by parents. The only difference in arrange marriage and love marriage is, that there is all family is involved in decision with the boy or girl so decision may be better. But it is true only about democratic families  where every member of family has equal right.But in some cases  only one person who is generally leader of the family(father) takes a decision on his parameters than the decision of marriage can be wrong or the girl or boy who is going to be married on behalf of that decision,is not satisfied with the decision or his /her wishes did not taken properly than they can ruined the marriage.Again in that situation the decision of one person (proper arranged marriage) can be wrong.Its all about the priorities. When someone think about marriage and love somebody than love comes to an end when marriage held because it was the aim of that love.So the difference of love marriage and arrange marriage is depends on the criteria of the person. And future calculation,security etc are the criteria than one can take a decision with his family if it is democratic or they can glamorised it in the name of love but it is also a type of arrange marriage which is arrange  by both(the girl-the boy).

BOL

'Bol' is very nice movie.It is Pakistani movie.The story of Bol is not a one line story,It is mixture of fundamentalism, narrow religious interpretations of holy books, It is about problem of over population.It is about third zender or other zender Identities.One can say that is is movie about pakistani women. According to feministic  perspective it is story of women liberation from patriarchal framework of traditional family.The main character of movie is a lady who is elder sister in her family. His father is self proclaimed knowledge holder of  religious books.He always try to find solutions of his problems in his religious books and interpret them according to his own specific perspective which make him as a villain in this story.But the massage of story shows that he is also a victim of his own conditional thinking  process.Movie raise a very right question that if none has the right to kill anyone  than  y people  have the right of giving birth to their child,if they are not able to fulfill their stomach .

WAGHA TOUR

It was  very nice tour.We visit the golden temple ,durgyana temple,jallianwala bag and  Amartsar airport.Sitting at the border of India Pakistan  was a amazing experience.We enjoyed a lot with friends while singing and dancing in bus with the help of mike.The only thing which i want to mention hear it is about the Wagha border. Now it becomes a tourist place because of the anger the way of parade of military from both the sides.Everyone is very much attracted about the way of parade Than it is necessary for the military of both the side  to maintain the high temper of anger while flag ceremony.Otherwise The wagha border also become a normal place like other border points.But is it good both the countries that always put on the fire by these techniques at border. Does peace friendship and cooperation does not matter.Does it not possible that the anger point become peace  and friendship point.The slogan of friendship should be higher instead of slogans of hate and anger.The throwing flowers from each sides and exchange of gifts is a dream only. Can it be possible in future.I remember a nice example  of a cricket match  series which had held in Pakistan and the environment of friendship and positiveness was very high at that time.And one very interesting thing,  whenever i meet any Pakistani at yahoo chat they chat very nicely and in a very respected manner.If it possible in these example than why not at Wagha border? Friends think and rethink about it.Its very dangerous tendency to maintain anger across the broders.

Kitne Ajeeb Rishte Hai (Page 3)

MEANS -END DEBATE

We all know this age old debate.But still we dont have the conclusion.Gandhi and Marx are the main symbols of this debate.Its endless debate.Personally i feel sometimes  we have to adopt some measures which we call generally immoral or amoral. Personally i dont have any strong opinion about these two poles but i found everywhere in our life we generally avoid the purity of means.In my opinion Gandhi also uses this thing when he gradually organise India's  freedom movement.Firstly he spoke about Non cooperation than Civil disobedience than Karo ya maro.People say that the factor of violence increases these three levels gradually.I think we should not be too idealistic.There is no absolute truth.Its microcosm-ism every where about every reality and we should work according to that reality.Evan Gandhi called his life as a 'Experiments with truth' He never claimed that he is the proponent the ultimate reality or truth.In our real life situations, sometimes people gives soft bribe to their department too.Evan sometimes one officials gives other officials for their departmental work.And one another very interesting thing about idealism/absolute truth theory that its very risky for humanity.How? As far as i think the most violence supporter ideologies and movement like Marxism,Naxalism,Terrorism,Revolution, Militarism .All these ism always justify themselves in the name of justice/truth.And they never ready to talk or debate about their perception about the related problems.They generally avoid  value of human life.Lastly their ideology and means become problems of others/humanity.